<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NO TECH MAGAZINE</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.notechmagazine.com/category/canals/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.notechmagazine.com</link>
	<description>We believe in progress and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 23:59:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Precolumbian Causeways and Canals</title>
		<link>https://www.notechmagazine.com/2014/05/precolumbian-causeways-and-canals.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kris de decker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Canals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wetlands]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notechmagazine.com/?p=21</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8220;In contrast to the Western obsession to drain what are considered marginal wetlands for agriculture, farmers in the Bolivian Amazon may have intentionally expanded wetlands and wetland productivity through earthwork construction, which impedes, rather than enhances, drainage. The precolumbian farmers did not use causeways as dikes to prevent inundation of fields and settlements, but rather [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1420" style="width: 721px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://www.notechmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/precolombian-causeways.jpg"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1420" class="wp-image-1420 size-full" src="http://www.notechmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/precolombian-causeways.jpg" alt="precolombian causeways" width="711" height="327" srcset="https://www.notechmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/precolombian-causeways.jpg 711w, https://www.notechmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/precolombian-causeways-500x229.jpg 500w" sizes="(max-width: 711px) 100vw, 711px" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-1420" class="wp-caption-text">Detail of an engineered landscape in the Bolivian Amazon. Artwork by Clark Erickson.</p></div>
<p>&#8220;In contrast to the Western obsession to drain what are considered marginal wetlands for agriculture, farmers in the Bolivian Amazon may have intentionally expanded wetlands and wetland productivity through earthwork construction, which impedes, rather than enhances, drainage.</p>
<p>The precolumbian farmers did not use causeways as dikes to prevent inundation of fields and settlements, but rather to expand and enhance inundation for agricultural production.</p>
<p>At the same time, impounding water with well-placed causeways and the creation of canals improved and extended the season of transportation by canoe across the landscape. The grid-like structure also permanently marked land tenure in a highly visible manner.&#8221;<span id="more-21"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;Causeways are flanked by canals on one or both sides where earth was removed to raise the road platform. Although badly eroded by cattle farming and farming activities, causeways are visible from the air as dark straight lines of trees and bushes that stand out against the grasses of the savanna.</p>
<p>Canals are marked by aquatic vegetation and standing water during the wet season and darker vegetation and soils during the dry season. Causeways range in elevation from 0.2 to 2 m  and in width from 1 to 20 m. Most causeways are straight over lengths ranging from tens of meters to kilometers.</p>
<p>Some of the most impressive causeways, canals, and raised fields are found on the Middle Apere River, [covering] an area larger than 60km2 along both sides of the river.&#8221;</p>
<div id="attachment_1425" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://www.notechmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/precolombian-causeways-2.jpg"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1425" loading="lazy" class="wp-image-1425 size-medium" src="http://www.notechmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/precolombian-causeways-2-500x306.jpg" alt="precolombian causeways 2" width="500" height="306" srcset="https://www.notechmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/precolombian-causeways-2-500x306.jpg 500w, https://www.notechmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/precolombian-causeways-2.jpg 828w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-1425" class="wp-caption-text">Precolumbian causeways (wide white lines) and raised field blocks (thin white lines) overlaid on an aerial photograph.</p></div>
<p>&#8220;For the precolumbian peoples who built them, these earthworks would have significantly extended growing seasons and reduced agricultural risk. Instead of wholesale diversion of overbank flow from the river onto the levee backslope, the primary hydrological function of the causeways may have been to create local catchment areas where local rainfall and floodwater were harvested for agriculture and the period of canoe access to wetlands during the dry season was extended.</p>
<p>Throughout the year, access to the wetlands for fishing, hunting, and collection of aquatic resources was improved through causeway construction and impounding of water. The resulting expansion of seasonal wetlands on the levee backslopes also improved nutrient capture and production within the blocks of causeways.&#8221;</p>
<p>Quoted from: &#8220;<a href="http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&amp;context=anthro_papers" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Precolumbian Causeways and Canals as Landesque Capital</a>&#8221; (PDF), Clark L. Erickson and John H. Walker, in &#8220;Landscapes of movement: Trails, Paths, and Roads in Anthropological Perspective&#8221;, edited by James E. Snead, Clark L. Erickson and J. Andrew Darling, University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology Philadelphia, 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hoisting Coal from Canal Boats with Dederick Machines</title>
		<link>https://www.notechmagazine.com/2010/07/hoisting-coal-from-canal-boats-with-dederick-machines.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kris de decker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 02:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cranes & lifting devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notechmagazine.com/2010/07/hoisting-coal-from-canal-boats-with-dederick-machines.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#8220;An improvement made by Mr. P. K. Dederick, of Albany, N.Y., was a horse-hoisting machine that very materially reduced the labor of the horse in hoisting. Previous to this, the horse walked forward to hoist a full bucket, and was obliged to back to lower the empty bucket into the hold of the vessel. With [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<a style="display: inline;" href="http://krisdedecker.typepad.com/.a/6a00e0099229e888330133f2217db0970b-pi"><img  class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00e0099229e888330133f2217db0970b image-full " alt="Hoisting coal from canal boats 2" title="Hoisting coal from canal boats 2" src="http://krisdedecker.typepad.com/.a/6a00e0099229e888330133f2217db0970b-800wi" border="0" /></a> </p>
<p>&#8220;An improvement made by Mr. P. K. Dederick, of Albany, N.Y., was a horse-hoisting machine that very materially reduced the labor of the horse in hoisting. Previous to this, the horse walked forward to hoist a full bucket, and was obliged to back to lower the empty bucket into the hold of the vessel. With most horses, this latter was harder work than hoisting the loaded bucket, while the Dederick machine increased the speed of unloading but little, it reduced the labor of the horse about one-half.&#8221;</p>
<p>Quoted from: &#8220;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.archive.org/details/coalhandlingmac00compgoog">Coal handling machinery</a>&#8220;, C.W.Hunt Company, 1893.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
